Max Igan on The Christchurch Shooting

There are many claims of fakery and hoax being spread in regard to the shooters video made during the March 15th Christchurch Massacre. My position has been to investigate these claims to determine for myself whether they were in fact valid. With this in mind, I conducted my own frame by frame investigation of the shooters live stream video and did so without having a desire for either side to be true. Now I am simply reporting my findings.

The main source of these claims appears to be James Fetzer and other contributers to Veterans Today.

Mr Fetzer has made numerous other claims as well such as there being no windshield damage from a series of shotgun blasts through the windshield, "CGI shell casings" being ejected from "toy guns that shoot a blast of air", Tarrant "firing at no one" up the street, a "mannequin" laying in the drive way, and set dressers applying "fake blood" to the scene - among others.

Here is a shot of James Fetzers "no windshield damage". I have marked the damage on the second image.

Frame 024548:

Here is another frame of the windshield damage. Again, I have marked the damage for you in the second image.

Frame 024261:

There are many frames of the video in which this damage can be seen, I have merely shown you 2 of them.

There are also many frames in the shooters video in which we clearly see the sun patches on the top of the car dashboard shining through the shotgun holes

Section from Frame 024335:
So unless Mr Fetzer somehow believes this damage just magically appeared when he "pretended to shoot his toy gun" well...

The claim of no windshield damage is a provably false claim.

Fetzer's claim Tarrant was shooting no one up the street:
Here is the man running:

Frame 016101:

Later when he looks in that direction, here is the body seen on the ground:

Frame 018292:


The claim Tarrant was shooting no one up the street is a provably false claim.

Fetzer's claim Tarrant was shooting no one down the alley:
Here is the man in the corner of the yard:

Frame 012068:

Here is the frame where we can see the body fall:

Frame 012073:


The claim Tarrant was shooting no one down the alley is a provably false claim.

Regarding James Fetzers claim of "disappearing shell casings" and that this stands as clear evidence of CGI. This is very simply and easily explained as being due to video compression. The point being: If you record a live stream to facebook in HD at say, 32fps, facebook will automatically reduce that video file to around 20fps, or less, for the upload, so a great many frames are left out of the original recording. It is therefore very understandable why something moving as fast as a shell casing may seem to drop out in some frames and appear to "vanish" on a video being streamed live to facebook, and thus stands as proof positive of nothing. Don't believe me? Then go strap on a head cam, fire off a few rounds and live stream it, then download the stream from facebook and tell me what you see. Very notably, the shell casings being ejected from the gun can actually be seen landing on the ground just a few frames later.

For example here is a brief analysis of 3 seconds of video footage when Tarrant fires 3 rounds up the street at around 9 minutes and 27 seconds into the live stream video:

Frame 16444:
Frame 16453:
Frame 16455:

Frame 16458:

Frame 16461:
Frame 16463:
Frame 16467:
Frame 16472:
Frame 16474:
Frame 16478:

For more on this analysis on shell casings and video compression please go to:

http://www.thecrowhouse.com/New_directory/

The file download is titled - ShellCasings_Analysis.zip" - The zip file contains two wmv files and a series of still frames - nine with added text.

But even so, some were not traveling as fast and so not all were subject to compression.
Here is a shell casing leaving the shotgun:

Frame 012046:

Here is that shell casing hitting the wall to disappear behind the plant:

Frame 012048:

Frame 012053:

Frame 012057:

Frame 012060:

The claim of no shell casings is a provably false claim.

Here is a simple and brief analysis of just one headshot claimed to be 'fake' with 'no blood'.

For more on this analysis please go to:

http://www.thecrowhouse.com/New_directory/

The file download is titled - "hs_analysis.zip" - It contains 2 wmv video files and a series of still frames - two with added text.

The claim there was no blood and no reaction from the bodies is a provably false claim.

All the claims so far being made of fakery that I can find are provably false as can be confirmed by any real examination of the shooters video. My position is one of questioning why these claims are being made. If you wish to confirm any of the above images for yourself, there are 2 good copies of the shooters video with which you can do so. One of 120mb containing 20319 frames and one of slightly higher res of 317mb containing 30476 frames. Each of the above images are still named as the original frame number in the 317mb video. So you can check the relevant frames and easily confirm everything I have shown you here for yourself. The 317mb version may be found by visiting THIS LINK This version does contain the audio dropout however audio is not needed for a frame by frame analysis

James Fetzer's claim of "fake plastic guns" or "toy guns" is also offered with zero evidence to support the claim - other than his repeated insistance that "Gordon Duff said so." His claim that a female victim laying in the driveway is a mannequin is also simply stated as fact yet completely unsupported by any corroborating evidence - and is in fact, much belied in view of a second woman who escaped the compound with her, and who can be clearly seen to be still running away up the street. The same can be said for Mr Fetzer's claim of "set dressers applying fake blood" to the doorstep. Again, the claim is simply stated, without a single shred of any evidence ever being offered to support it.

In regard to Fetzer's claim of "bodies already being piled in the corners" Well the question must be asked. Were they piled, or were they crouching in fear? By way of comparison, there is another video that has been posted claiming to show the second attack at Linwood Mosque. I have since confirmed this claim to be false. But even so, it undoudtedly depicts a real Mosque attack and as such, can still provide some valuable insights into how people actually react in such a tense situation. And in viewing this footage, I ask you, what are the people doing? They are cowering and attempting to hide under each other in the corners... just as we saw in Christchurch. Click Here To View

 

In regard to Christchurch I do however find there are 4 indisputable points contained within the shooters video that very clearly prove the government and media is lying. My main concern now, is that these 4 very important points are being deliberately covered in smoke, noise and misdirection by highly speculative claims of fakery, CGI shell casings, mannequins and hoaxes, all of which are speculation and conjecture, none of which can be proven, and all of which are obscuring the very real evidence the shooters video actualy reveals.

1. There is evidence of a man in red at the drive way when the shooter first entered the Mosque compound.

2. That man in red can again be clearly seen standing by the wall when Tarrant shot the final victim in the street.

3. There was a car parked at the mosque entrance when the shooting began.

That car left half way through the proceedings after most of the shooting had occurred inside - in full view of the shooter, and while he was shooting a man escaping from the back corner.

The car in question, a silver Toyota Will VS registration FQH875 was seen again driving through a Police barrier soon after...

4. Each time Tarrant went outside to shoot an escapee, he stopped everything he was doing and quite literally ran to exactly the right place to shoot them in time. This is only possible if a 3rd party was giving him messages in an earpiece to alert him of people escaping from three completely different points on the perimeter, none of which he had any line of sight to.

Conclusion: This was not a Lone wolf shooting by a white supremacist. This was an organized hit using multiple players as clearly seen and evidenced by the shooters own video. Jacinda Ardern is a liar and the people of New Zealand are being disarmed under false pretenses - And its happening so fast because the Government is terrified of what will happen if the people find out. The previous observations stand as 4 very clear and resolute points that cannot be disputed, cannot be debated, are not open to speculation or conjecture. They are simply facts made extremely clear by the shooters video itself.

All claims of "CGI/Hoax" etc appear to be based on speculation and conjecture that I feel is purposely designed to create as much noise and confusion around the real and solid evidence as possible; to misdirect people away from placing any focus on some very real and indisputable facts contained within the shooters video, that confirm beyond any shadow of doubt that the NZ government is lying.

The claims of hoax and CGI are damage control. People are being played and if they cannot get a bit of focus, learn to think for themselves and start reporting some real truth regarding this shooting, we are going to get totally screwed over this event. When properly examined, all evidence in the actual shooters video suggests that this shooting was real, and claiming its fake is one of the things that is going to be used to shut us all down.

People simply do not realize how well they have been prepped for this event. And as I previously said, I havent been looking at this attempting to prove it either way. Belief is the enemy of knowledge. I look at each event separately and upon inspection, I simply cannot find one shred of anything substantial to prove any of the claims of fakery people are pushing regarding this shooting. In fact the more I look, the more I find exactly the opposite. I dont have any stake in what I see either way, Im just sharing my findings... and I tell ya... everyone has dropped the ball on this.

This is my opinion of what I am witnessing occur with this event and people can feel free to think anything they want of me for pointing all this out.

Max Igan